Federal ICAC now

Tony Abbott’s office ‘aided Chinese donation’ after ASIO warning

Case for Federal ICAC
Deceptive Conduct | Liberal Party | QED
Liberal Party

Tony Abbott’s office ‘aided Chinese donation’ after ASIO warning

June 2016

Tony Abbott’s office helped the Australian-based Chinese billionaire property developer Huang Xiangmo, who had been labelled an “agent of a foreign country”, to donate to the Liberal Party, according to the Sydney Morning Herald.

Mr Abbott had reportedly been warned by ASIO about the donor’s links to the Chinese Communist Party the previous year, in 2015, while Mr Abbott was prime minister.

“Mr Abbott is aware that Mr Huang sought to donate to the Liberal Party and understands he was encouraged to do so in accordance with AEC rules,” a spokesman for Mr Abbott said when asked on about the former prime minister’s dealings with Mr Huang as the businessman sought to donate during the 2016 election campaign.

​But sources familiar with the matter reportedly told the Sydney Morning Herald that Mr Abbott’s office directly contacted at least one local Liberal campaign team to discuss​ ​Mr Huang’s offer of donations.

It was also reported that following media inquiries, Andrew Hastie, the chair of federal parliament’s national security committee, revealed he had instructed the WA Liberal Party to return $10,000 after tracing the funds to a company controlled by Mr Huang, Chaoshan 1 Pty Ltd.

According to the Sydney Morning Herald, the payment from Mr Huang’s company went to Mr Hastie’s Federal Electorate Conference, managed by the Liberal Party. It was one of several payments by Mr Huang’s companies worth $140,000 to various Liberal campaigns ahead of the 2016 election.

Mr Huang’s companies also donated $85,000 to Labor in the months before the election.

What's a rort?

Conflicts of Interest

Redirecting funding to pet hobbies; offering jobs to the boys without a proper tender process; secretly bankrolling candidates in elections; taking up private sector jobs in apparent breach of parliament’s code of ethics, the list goes on.

Deceptive Conduct

Claiming that greenhouse gas emissions have gone down when the facts clearly show otherwise; breaking the law on responding to FoI requests; reneging on promised legislation; claiming credit for legislation that doesn’t exist; accepting donations that breach rules. You get the drift of what behaviour this category captures.

Election Rorts

In the months before the last election, the Government spent hundreds of millions of dollars of Australian taxpayers’ money on grants for sports, community safety, rural development programs and more. Many of these grants were disproportionally awarded to marginal seats, with limited oversight and even less accountability.

Dubious Travel Claims

Ministerial business that just happens to coincide with a grand final or a concert; electorate business that must be conducted in prime tourist locations, or at the same time as party fundraisers. All above board, maybe, but does it really pass the pub test? Or does it just reinforce the fact that politicians take the public for mugs?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This