Federal ICAC now

Sloppy Joe Hockey and his Cabcharges

Case for Federal ICAC
Deceptive Conduct | Dubious Travel Claims | QED
Liberal Party

Sloppy Joe Hockey and his Cabcharges

2009 – 2011

Joe Hockey flew out of Sydney on April 17, 2011, landed in Dubai on April 18, yet was also recorded as taking a $190 hire car ride from his Hunters Hill home to Channel Seven and back again.

On the day that then treasurer Joe Hockey declared “The age of entitlement is over” in a speech in London, he received a two-page letter advising of an “apparent fraud” against his taxpayer-funded Cabcharge card involving alleged “phantom journeys” amounting to thousands of dollars.

Documents obtained by the Sydney Morning Herald after a two-year freedom of information process show the rules for MPs using privately chauffeured hire cars were repeatedly broken in relation to Mr Hockey’s account.

Drivers from a favoured hire car company had filled out and signed on Hockey’s behalf Cabcharge dockets worth at least $10,000, dating back to 2009.

Many of the dockets – for amounts as high as $760 each at $95 an hour – do not contain destination or time details, but simply state the driver transported Hockey “as directed” for up to eight hours at a time.

On one occasion, according to the Sydney Morning Herald, Hockey departed Sydney on the evening of April 17, 2011, landed in Dubai at 5.45 am on April 18, yet was also recorded as taking a $190 hire car ride in Sydney from his Hunters Hill home to Channel Seven and back again. The trip was recorded on a hand-written Cabcharge docket and signed by the driver on Mr Hockey’s behalf. And the account details on the docket were those of a cancelled card, according to the federal department of finance.

The Senators and Members Handbook states that “the passenger should sign the contractor’s travel docket, detailing the location, kilometres, time and cost of the trip and ensure these details are forwarded to Ministerial and Parliamentary Services”.

Joe Hockey

What's a rort?

Conflicts of Interest

Redirecting funding to pet hobbies; offering jobs to the boys without a proper tender process; secretly bankrolling candidates in elections; taking up private sector jobs in apparent breach of parliament’s code of ethics, the list goes on.

Deceptive Conduct

Claiming that greenhouse gas emissions have gone down when the facts clearly show otherwise; breaking the law on responding to FoI requests; reneging on promised legislation; claiming credit for legislation that doesn’t exist; accepting donations that breach rules. You get the drift of what behaviour this category captures.

Election Rorts

In the months before the last election, the Government spent hundreds of millions of dollars of Australian taxpayers’ money on grants for sports, community safety, rural development programs and more. Many of these grants were disproportionally awarded to marginal seats, with limited oversight and even less accountability.

Dubious Travel Claims

Ministerial business that just happens to coincide with a grand final or a concert; electorate business that must be conducted in prime tourist locations, or at the same time as party fundraisers. All above board, maybe, but does it really pass the pub test? Or does it just reinforce the fact that politicians take the public for mugs?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This