Federal ICAC now

Scott Morrison and that phone call to the NSW police commissioner

Case for Federal ICAC
Conflicts of Interest | Liberal Party | QED
Liberal Party

Scott Morrison and that phone call to the NSW police commissioner

November 2019

The Prime Minister was roundly condemned after admitting in Parliament that he had telephoned the New South Wales Police Commissioner Mick Fuller about the then ongoing investigation into the Angus Taylor/Sydney City Council affair.

Scott Morrison and Mick Fuller used to be neighbours and both men have joked about Morrison bringing Fuller’s bins in for him. Fuller has since said Morrison never did that for him. Both Morrison and Fuller insist the phone call was innocuous but will not release the transcript. The Police Commissioner himself said: “To be honest with you, I actually don’t feel as though the allegations themselves are serious… But at the end of the day they’re public figures, and at the end of the day I’m assuming that the public and the media would expect that we take all matters seriously against public figures.”

Labor accused Mr Morrison of trying to influence the police findings about his minister after the Prime Minister told Parliament he had made the call to Mr Fuller to discuss the “substance” of the investigation.

Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull declared he would not have made the phone call because the matter had to be “entirely free of political influence” and seen to be so.

Barrister Geoffrey Watson said Mr Morrison should not have made the call because it looked like he had sought a “favour” from the police chief.

Jennifer Wilson wrote for Independent Australia: “Whatever information Fuller did convey to Morrison, it was sufficient for the Prime Minister to decide there were no grounds to stand Taylor down. This would seem to contradict any claims of the innocuous nature of the call and it should ring alarm bells. Obviously, the Police Commissioner did say enough – before the investigation even began – to reassure Morrison there wasn’t going to be much to it.”

What's a rort?

Conflicts of Interest

Redirecting funding to pet hobbies; offering jobs to the boys without a proper tender process; secretly bankrolling candidates in elections; taking up private sector jobs in apparent breach of parliament’s code of ethics, the list goes on.

Deceptive Conduct

Claiming that greenhouse gas emissions have gone down when the facts clearly show otherwise; breaking the law on responding to FoI requests; reneging on promised legislation; claiming credit for legislation that doesn’t exist; accepting donations that breach rules. You get the drift of what behaviour this category captures.

Election Rorts

In the months before the last election, the Government spent hundreds of millions of dollars of Australian taxpayers’ money on grants for sports, community safety, rural development programs and more. Many of these grants were disproportionally awarded to marginal seats, with limited oversight and even less accountability.

Dubious Travel Claims

Ministerial business that just happens to coincide with a grand final or a concert; electorate business that must be conducted in prime tourist locations, or at the same time as party fundraisers. All above board, maybe, but does it really pass the pub test? Or does it just reinforce the fact that politicians take the public for mugs?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This