Federal ICAC now

Morrison ditched Turnbull plans for lobbying transparency

Case for Federal ICAC
Deceptive Conduct | Liberal Party | QED
Liberal Party

Morrison ditched Turnbull plans for lobbying transparency

September 2019

One of the Morrison government’s first acts was to kill off Malcolm Turnbull’s plan for greater transparency about how lobbyists interact with the federal government, leaving in place a system widely regarded as ineffective, according to the Sydney Morning Herald.

The National Audit Office review of the Lobbying Code of Conduct strongly criticised the government for failing to implement the recommendations of a previous audit of the lobbying regime. It shows Mr Morrison and Attorney-General Christian Porter terminated plans to enshrine the lobbying code in legislation. The current system is regulatory, meaning there are no penalties for failure to comply other than being struck off the register.

The audit – a follow-up to an audit it published in 2018 – again found major flaws in what it described as a “light touch” system. The Attorney-General’s Department’s own analysis showed the Code fully met just one of 10 principles for “transparency and integrity in lobbying” set down by the OECD.

The lobbyists’ register – essentially a spreadsheet naming lobbyists, their firms, clients and any previous connections to government – has also been plagued by technical failures. In September, a technical problem caused Mr Porter to wrongly tell Parliament there were 836 lobbyists on the register when in fact there were fewer than 600.

Auditors also lashed the Attorney-General’s Department (AGD) for failing to use the compliance mechanisms at its disposal. At the end of January, there were 29 lobbyists on the register who had left government positions in the previous 12 months and were therefore prohibited from lobbying on certain topics. But the AGD only notified six of the 29 lobbyists about this prohibition.

Read more.

What's a rort?

Conflicts of Interest

Redirecting funding to pet hobbies; offering jobs to the boys without a proper tender process; secretly bankrolling candidates in elections; taking up private sector jobs in apparent breach of parliament’s code of ethics, the list goes on.

Deceptive Conduct

Claiming that greenhouse gas emissions have gone down when the facts clearly show otherwise; breaking the law on responding to FoI requests; reneging on promised legislation; claiming credit for legislation that doesn’t exist; accepting donations that breach rules. You get the drift of what behaviour this category captures.

Election Rorts

In the months before the last election, the Government spent hundreds of millions of dollars of Australian taxpayers’ money on grants for sports, community safety, rural development programs and more. Many of these grants were disproportionally awarded to marginal seats, with limited oversight and even less accountability.

Dubious Travel Claims

Ministerial business that just happens to coincide with a grand final or a concert; electorate business that must be conducted in prime tourist locations, or at the same time as party fundraisers. All above board, maybe, but does it really pass the pub test? Or does it just reinforce the fact that politicians take the public for mugs?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This