Federal ICAC now

Jobs for the boys? The limits of limited tendering

Case for Federal ICAC
Conflicts of Interest | QED

Jobs for the boys? The limits of limited tendering

November 2019

The Coalition Government appointed former Liberal staffer to a $500,000 a year job through a limited tender.

The Coalition Government appointed former Liberal staffer Adam Boynton interim national skills commissioner, a job paying $500,000 a year, through a limited tender that was not open to all and was exempt from procurement rules that guarantee fairness and impartiality. Boyton is a former policy director and chief of staff to the former NSW Liberal leader John Brogden.

Employment and skills minister Michaelia Cash said Cabinet appointed Boynton after an “open merit-driven, competitive process”. However, the original Austender contract notice said Boynton won the job through limited tender “due to an absence of competition for technical reasons”. This Austender entry was later amended to state he was hired under a limited tender because of the exception for labour hire contracts.

More on this scandal

What's a rort?

Conflicts of Interest

Redirecting funding to pet hobbies; offering jobs to the boys without a proper tender process; secretly bankrolling candidates in elections; taking up private sector jobs in apparent breach of parliament’s code of ethics, the list goes on.

Deceptive Conduct

Claiming that greenhouse gas emissions have gone down when the facts clearly show otherwise; breaking the law on responding to FoI requests; reneging on promised legislation; claiming credit for legislation that doesn’t exist; accepting donations that breach rules. You get the drift of what behaviour this category captures.

Election Rorts

In the months before the last election, the Government spent hundreds of millions of dollars of Australian taxpayers’ money on grants for sports, community safety, rural development programs and more. Many of these grants were disproportionally awarded to marginal seats, with limited oversight and even less accountability.

Dubious Travel Claims

Ministerial business that just happens to coincide with a grand final or a concert; electorate business that must be conducted in prime tourist locations, or at the same time as party fundraisers. All above board, maybe, but does it really pass the pub test? Or does it just reinforce the fact that politicians take the public for mugs?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This