Federal ICAC now

Drought envoy Barnaby Joyce’s ‘three weeks on the ground’

Case for Federal ICAC
Deceptive Conduct | QED | The Nationals

Drought envoy Barnaby Joyce’s ‘three weeks on the ground’

August 2018 – May 2019

Barnaby Joyce spent less than three weeks on the ground in drought-affected communities outside of his electorate while engaged as the government’s special drought envoy, MP travel records show, according to Guardian Australia.

He claimed $675,000 in expenses for the nine months in the role and was allocated two staff members to conduct his work at a cost of an estimated $200,000. The $675,000 figure includes Joyce’s normal work as a backbencher, but the government refused to release details of how much the envoy position cost taxpayers.

It was also revealed in Parliament that he never produced a final report on his role. Joyce said he sent “an awful lot” of correspondence to the prime minister, Scott Morrison, including by text message, about his findings. Joyce told the ABC he was unclear if he was required to produce a report. “I would have to look at my letter of engagement, but regardless of what it says, I provided reports so whether it did or it didn’t, I provided reports.”

Read more

The Case for a Federal ICAC

What's a rort?

Conflicts of Interest

Redirecting funding to pet hobbies; offering jobs to the boys without a proper tender process; secretly bankrolling candidates in elections; taking up private sector jobs in apparent breach of parliament’s code of ethics, the list goes on.

Deceptive Conduct

Claiming that greenhouse gas emissions have gone down when the facts clearly show otherwise; breaking the law on responding to FoI requests; reneging on promised legislation; claiming credit for legislation that doesn’t exist; accepting donations that breach rules. You get the drift of what behaviour this category captures.

Election Rorts

In the months before the last election, the Government spent hundreds of millions of dollars of Australian taxpayers’ money on grants for sports, community safety, rural development programs and more. Many of these grants were disproportionally awarded to marginal seats, with limited oversight and even less accountability.

Dubious Travel Claims

Ministerial business that just happens to coincide with a grand final or a concert; electorate business that must be conducted in prime tourist locations, or at the same time as party fundraisers. All above board, maybe, but does it really pass the pub test? Or does it just reinforce the fact that politicians take the public for mugs?

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This